Why is it important for a collision investigator to distinguish between facts and opinions?

It is crucial for a collision investigator to distinguish between facts and opinions to ensure accurate reporting and analysis. In the context of collision investigations, facts are objective pieces of evidence, such as vehicle dynamics, skid marks, and the physical condition of the vehicles involved. Opinions, on the other hand, may arise from subjective interpretations or personal views of witnesses or even investigators. By clearly separating these two elements, the investigator can provide a more reliable and credible account of the incident.

Accurate reporting is essential because the findings from the investigation can impact legal proceedings, insurance claims, and public safety assessments. When the investigation is rooted in factual data, it enhances the validity of the conclusions drawn, thereby contributing to a clearer understanding of how the collision occurred and the factors that contributed to it.

In contrast, relying heavily on opinions can introduce biases and inaccuracies, leading to a distorted understanding of the event. Therefore, a clear distinction between objective facts and subjective opinions is foundational to conducting thorough and effective collision investigations.