Which Supreme Court ruling addressed the issue of shooting unarmed, nonviolent fleeing felony suspects?

The ruling in Tennessee v. Garner is significant because it established a critical standard regarding the use of deadly force against fleeing suspects. The Supreme Court determined that law enforcement officers may not use deadly force against unarmed, nonviolent fleeing suspects unless it is necessary to prevent the suspect from escaping and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. This decision was pivotal in shaping the use of force policies within law enforcement agencies, highlighting the importance of assessing the immediate threat a suspect may pose before resorting to lethal action.

The other options do not pertain to this specific issue. For instance, Miranda v. Arizona focuses on the rights of criminal suspects during interrogation. Furman v. Georgia dealt with the constitutionality of the death penalty. Atwater v. Lago Vista addressed the legality of arrests for misdemeanors. Each of these cases, while significant in their own right, does not address the particular question about the use of deadly force against fleeing suspects.