Which of the following statements is true regarding the freedom of speech?

The statement that only non-violent speech is protected is accurate because the First Amendment of the United States Constitution does provide for broad protections of free speech, but there are important limitations when it comes to violent or dangerous speech. Non-violent speech encompasses a wide range of expressive activities, including political speech, artistic expression, and personal opinions.

However, speech that incites violence or creates a direct threat to public safety is not protected. This principle is encapsulated in the Supreme Court's decision in cases like Schenck v. United States and Brandenburg v. Ohio, which established that speech can be restricted if it poses a clear and present danger or if it's meant to incite imminent lawless action.

Understanding this distinction is critical, especially in contexts where free speech is exercised in ways that could potentially harm others or disrupt public order. Hence, non-violent speech maintains its protective blanket under the First Amendment, reinforcing the idea that while individuals have the right to express their thoughts and opinions, such freedoms are not absolute when they intersect with potential violence or threats.