Which case is associated with the "Fleeing Felon Doctrine" allowing officers to use deadly force on fleeing felons?

The case associated with the "Fleeing Felon Doctrine" is Tennessee v. Garner. This landmark decision established that law enforcement officers cannot use deadly force against a fleeing suspect unless there is probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others. The ruling emphasized the constitutional rights of individuals, balancing the need for effective law enforcement with the protection of individual liberties.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that the use of deadly force against a fleeing felon is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling thereby limited the circumstances under which officers may resort to such measures, requiring a direct threat to ensure the use of deadly force is justified. This fundamentally shifted the application of police practices regarding pursuit and apprehension of suspects, underscoring the necessity of adhering to constitutional protections.

The other choices listed do not pertain to the use of deadly force or the Fleeing Felon Doctrine. Graham v. Connor addresses the standard for assessing excessive force claims under the Fourth Amendment, Miranda v. Arizona deals with the rights of suspects in police custody, and Roe v. Wade focuses on reproductive rights. Each of these cases addresses different aspects of law and constitutional rights but does not relate directly