What phrase should be avoided when documenting prior incidents in the report?

When documenting prior incidents in a report, it is essential to provide clear and specific information. Using the phrase "Same as above" should be avoided because it lacks clarity and detail. This phrase doesn't convey any substantive information about the incidents, which may lead to confusion for anyone reviewing the report. Instead of aiding comprehension, it assumes that the reader has retained all prior details, which may not be the case.

A well-rounded report should include complete and independent accounts of each incident to ensure that all relevant information is accessible and can be understood without needing to reference previous sections. This practice enhances the report's effectiveness and promotes thorough understanding for anyone reviewing it. Other phrases, like "Please see attached," while needing supplementing documentation, direct the reader to additional resources, and may be appropriate in contexts where attached details exist. Similarly, "Not applicable" and "Details available upon request" indicate conditions or the need for further communication, but they also do not compromise clarity in the same way as "Same as above."