True or False: Name calling directed at an officer is considered "fighting words."

The assertion that name-calling directed at an officer is considered "fighting words" is accurate. "Fighting words" are defined in legal contexts as those utterances which are inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction from the person to whom they are directed. This doctrine is based on the principle that certain speech can incite immediate breaches of the peace.

When someone directs derogatory name-calling at a law enforcement officer, it can not only be seen as disrespectful but also as a provocation that may incite a confrontation, potentially leading to violence. The courts recognize that this type of speech can escalate a situation rather than contribute to a peaceful discussion. Therefore, this interpretation supports the idea that such behavior fits within the legal category of "fighting words," establishing a direct link to the potential for provocation and public disorder.

The other options introduce conditions (such as profanity or the requirement of provoking violence) that are not necessary for name-calling to be classified under this category of speech. The essence of "fighting words" lies in their potential to provoke, not solely on specific language or circumstances.